Realiza una revisión rápida del riesgo de listas de reproducción antes de gastar presupuesto, colocar una canción o enviar una recomendación a un cliente.
Diseñado para especialistas en marketing musical, equipos de propuestas y sellos discográficos independientes.
Usa un enlace de lista de reproducción pública para la revisión más rápida
Pega una URL de lista de reproducción pública de Spotify cuando quieras el escaneo más rápido. Si la lista de reproducción es privada o colaborativa, conecta Spotify primero y luego ejecuta la revisión con el acceso de tu cuenta.
This playlist is not publicly readable. Use a public Spotify playlist link.
Workspace Preview
Paste a playlist link to populate the overview, review summary, evidence panels, and the embedded paid modules below.
Resumen de la Lista de Reproducción
The dashboard will fill with playlist metadata, review evidence, and action guidance once you run a scan.
Overview
1 link
Paste one Spotify playlist URL to populate the report.
Review Summary
3 states
Low, Moderate, or Elevated review outcomes.
Evidence
Explainable
Flags and notes stay tied to visible playlist signals.
Próximo paso recomendado
Revisión General
Waiting for scan
Confianza
Pending
Run a scan to unlock the next-step guidance
The tool will convert current playlist signals into a due-diligence recommendation your team can shortlist, pause, or escalate.
History
Paid
Saved scans and trend context live inside the dashboard.
Pitch Copy
Contextual
Pitch generation uses the current review as context.
Signals this workspace checks
History & trend panel
Paid keeps scan history in the workspace so teams can review changes over time and keep a documented trail.
Overview
1 link
Review Summary
3 states
Evidence
Explainable
History
Paid
Unlock history and saved review context
Paid adds saved scan history, repeat-scan context, and client-ready report framing inside the dashboard.
Unlock PaidThis tool is built for the moment when a team needs to decide whether a playlist is worth pitching, worth paying for, or worth escalating for manual review. It does not claim to confirm fraud. It organizes current playlist evidence into a documented due-diligence workflow.
Use the dashboard before you buy placement, pitch a curator, or include a playlist in a client-facing recommendation. The goal is to reduce avoidable campaign risk and force a review step before money or reputation is on the line.
The review focuses on visible playlist evidence such as metadata quality, duplicate density, artist concentration, availability issues, and high-risk wording in titles or descriptions. That keeps the output explainable for internal QA and client conversations.
The free layer gives a verdict, confidence level, and top review flags. Paid unlocks the deeper working material: saved history, fuller notes, client-ready reporting, and pitch generation that uses the current review as context.
This dashboard works best when you treat it as a pre-approval step before playlist outreach, paid placement, or client reporting.
Start with the exact playlist you are considering for a pitch, placement buy, or recommendation. Public playlists work immediately from the link.
Check whether the playlist lands in Low, Moderate, or Elevated review. That first verdict tells your team how much manual review is still needed.
Use the flags, policy wording checks, and manual notes to understand why the verdict was produced. The tool is meant to support due diligence, not replace judgment.
Use the review to move forward with the playlist, pause it for extra checking, or document why it should be removed from your shortlist.
The tool focuses on current playlist evidence that can be explained to a team, artist, or client instead of making black-box fraud claims.
Titles, descriptions, owner presentation, and other visible metadata are reviewed for low-quality or suspicious patterns.
The dashboard looks for unusual artist concentration, roster mismatch, and composition patterns that deserve extra human review.
Duplicate tracks, unavailable songs, repeated release patterns, and other maintenance issues are surfaced as explainable review flags.
Playlist title and description wording is checked against publicly risky promotional language such as guaranteed placement or guaranteed streams.
The strongest use case is the point where someone must approve a playlist target, document a recommendation, or stop a questionable placement before it becomes a problem.
Run candidate playlists through the dashboard before outreach starts so weak targets are filtered out before an artist or client sees them.
Use the review output as a written record of why a playlist was approved, paused, or escalated for more checking.
Agencies and consultants can use the structured notes to explain why a playlist belongs on a shortlist or why it should be excluded.
These are representative workflow moments, not promises about what every scan will find. They show how a team can use the tool before making a placement decision.
An artist pastes a playlist they were asked to pay for and sees multiple review flags tied to wording, duplication, and concentration signals.
Outcome: the playlist is paused for manual review before any money is spent.
A pitching team uses the dashboard to clean a shortlist and remove playlists that would be hard to defend in a client update.
Outcome: only the playlists with cleaner review profiles move into outreach.
A label scans candidate playlists so internal stakeholders can see the verdict, evidence, and saved history before approving budget.
Outcome: the campaign decision is easier to justify and easier to revisit later.
No. Resalta señales de revisión y banderas de debida diligencia que respaldan la revisión manual.
Spotify no proporciona APIs de seguidores históricos. Los escaneos guardados pueden construir historial con el tiempo.
Los clientes de Agency pueden exportar informes PDF listos para clientes.
No. Las agencias se benefician más de las funciones de flujo de trabajo, pero los sellos discográficos y los artistas también pueden usar el proceso de revisión.
Significa que se activaron múltiples señales de revisión y la lista de reproducción merece una revisión manual más detallada antes de la colocación.
No. Esta es una herramienta de debida diligencia y control de calidad de campañas, no un motor de veredicto de fraude definitivo.
Es más útil para agencias, sellos discográficos independientes y artistas serios que revisan listas de reproducción antes de pagar por colocación.
Los usuarios gratuitos pueden realizar hasta 3 escaneos por mes y ver la revisión general, la confianza y las 3 señales principales.
Los planes de pago desbloquean detalles completos de la revisión, historial de escaneos guardados y rutas de exportación de nivel de agencia, dependiendo del plan.
El riesgo te dice cuánta revisión manual merece una lista de reproducción. La confianza te dice cuán completa es la evidencia actual.
Sí. La revisión está diseñada para respaldar el control de calidad de campañas, las discusiones de aprobación de listas de reproducción y la revisión manual documentada antes de aprobar el gasto.
Agency añade funciones de flujo de trabajo para clientes, como exportación con marca blanca, notas para clientes y organización de carpetas de campaña para equipos que gestionan colocaciones en nombre de otros.