예산을 사용하거나, 트랙을 배치하거나, 고객에게 추천하기 전에 빠른 플레이리스트 위험 검토를 실행하세요.
음악 마케터, 피칭 팀 및 인디 레이블을 위해 제작되었습니다.
가장 빠른 검토를 위해 공개 플레이리스트 링크 사용
가장 빠른 스캔을 원할 때 공개 Spotify 플레이리스트 URL을 붙여넣으세요. 플레이리스트가 비공개 또는 공동 작업용인 경우 Spotify를 먼저 연결한 다음 계정 액세스로 검토를 실행하세요.
This playlist is not publicly readable. Use a public Spotify playlist link.
Workspace Preview
Paste a playlist link to populate the overview, review summary, evidence panels, and the embedded paid modules below.
플레이리스트 요약
The dashboard will fill with playlist metadata, review evidence, and action guidance once you run a scan.
Overview
1 link
Paste one Spotify playlist URL to populate the report.
Review Summary
3 states
Low, Moderate, or Elevated review outcomes.
Evidence
Explainable
Flags and notes stay tied to visible playlist signals.
권장 다음 단계
전체 검토
Waiting for scan
신뢰도
Pending
Run a scan to unlock the next-step guidance
The tool will convert current playlist signals into a due-diligence recommendation your team can shortlist, pause, or escalate.
History
Paid
Saved scans and trend context live inside the dashboard.
Pitch Copy
Contextual
Pitch generation uses the current review as context.
Signals this workspace checks
History & trend panel
Paid keeps scan history in the workspace so teams can review changes over time and keep a documented trail.
Overview
1 link
Review Summary
3 states
Evidence
Explainable
History
Paid
Unlock history and saved review context
Paid adds saved scan history, repeat-scan context, and client-ready report framing inside the dashboard.
Unlock PaidThis tool is built for the moment when a team needs to decide whether a playlist is worth pitching, worth paying for, or worth escalating for manual review. It does not claim to confirm fraud. It organizes current playlist evidence into a documented due-diligence workflow.
Use the dashboard before you buy placement, pitch a curator, or include a playlist in a client-facing recommendation. The goal is to reduce avoidable campaign risk and force a review step before money or reputation is on the line.
The review focuses on visible playlist evidence such as metadata quality, duplicate density, artist concentration, availability issues, and high-risk wording in titles or descriptions. That keeps the output explainable for internal QA and client conversations.
The free layer gives a verdict, confidence level, and top review flags. Paid unlocks the deeper working material: saved history, fuller notes, client-ready reporting, and pitch generation that uses the current review as context.
This dashboard works best when you treat it as a pre-approval step before playlist outreach, paid placement, or client reporting.
Start with the exact playlist you are considering for a pitch, placement buy, or recommendation. Public playlists work immediately from the link.
Check whether the playlist lands in Low, Moderate, or Elevated review. That first verdict tells your team how much manual review is still needed.
Use the flags, policy wording checks, and manual notes to understand why the verdict was produced. The tool is meant to support due diligence, not replace judgment.
Use the review to move forward with the playlist, pause it for extra checking, or document why it should be removed from your shortlist.
The tool focuses on current playlist evidence that can be explained to a team, artist, or client instead of making black-box fraud claims.
Titles, descriptions, owner presentation, and other visible metadata are reviewed for low-quality or suspicious patterns.
The dashboard looks for unusual artist concentration, roster mismatch, and composition patterns that deserve extra human review.
Duplicate tracks, unavailable songs, repeated release patterns, and other maintenance issues are surfaced as explainable review flags.
Playlist title and description wording is checked against publicly risky promotional language such as guaranteed placement or guaranteed streams.
The strongest use case is the point where someone must approve a playlist target, document a recommendation, or stop a questionable placement before it becomes a problem.
Run candidate playlists through the dashboard before outreach starts so weak targets are filtered out before an artist or client sees them.
Use the review output as a written record of why a playlist was approved, paused, or escalated for more checking.
Agencies and consultants can use the structured notes to explain why a playlist belongs on a shortlist or why it should be excluded.
These are representative workflow moments, not promises about what every scan will find. They show how a team can use the tool before making a placement decision.
An artist pastes a playlist they were asked to pay for and sees multiple review flags tied to wording, duplication, and concentration signals.
Outcome: the playlist is paused for manual review before any money is spent.
A pitching team uses the dashboard to clean a shortlist and remove playlists that would be hard to defend in a client update.
Outcome: only the playlists with cleaner review profiles move into outreach.
A label scans candidate playlists so internal stakeholders can see the verdict, evidence, and saved history before approving budget.
Outcome: the campaign decision is easier to justify and easier to revisit later.
아니요. 수동 검토를 지원하는 검토 신호와 실사 플래그를 강조합니다.
Spotify는 과거 팔로워 API를 제공하지 않습니다. 저장된 스캔은 시간이 지남에 따라 기록을 구축할 수 있습니다.
Agency 고객은 고객 준비 PDF 보고서를 내보낼 수 있습니다.
아니요. 대행사는 워크플로 기능에서 가장 큰 이점을 얻지만, 레이블과 아티스트도 검토 프로세스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
여러 검토 플래그가 트리거되었으며 배치 전에 플레이리스트에 대한 더 면밀한 수동 검토가 필요함을 의미합니다.
아니요. 이것은 실사 및 캠페인 QA 도구이며, 결정적인 사기 판결 엔진이 아닙니다.
배치 비용을 지불하기 전에 플레이리스트를 검토하는 대행사, 인디 레이블 및 진지한 아티스트에게 가장 유용합니다.
무료 사용자는 월 최대 3회 스캔을 실행하고 전체 검토, 신뢰도 및 상위 3개 플래그를 볼 수 있습니다.
유료 플랜은 플랜에 따라 전체 검토 세부 정보, 저장된 스캔 기록 및 대행사 등급 내보내기 경로를 잠금 해제합니다.
위험은 플레이리스트에 얼마나 많은 수동 검토가 필요한지를 알려줍니다. 신뢰도는 현재 증거가 얼마나 완전한지를 알려줍니다.
예. 이 검토는 캠페인 QA, 플레이리스트 승인 논의 및 지출 승인 전에 문서화된 수동 검토를 지원하도록 설계되었습니다.
Agency는 화이트 라벨 내보내기, 고객 메모 및 타인을 대신하여 배치를 관리하는 팀을 위한 캠페인 폴더 정리와 같은 고객 대면 워크플로 기능을 추가합니다.