Effectuez une revue rapide des risques de playlist avant de dépenser votre budget, de placer un titre ou d'envoyer une recommandation à un client.
Conçu pour les spécialistes du marketing musical, les équipes de pitching et les labels indépendants.
Utilisez un lien de playlist public pour la revue la plus rapide
Collez une URL de playlist Spotify publique lorsque vous souhaitez une analyse rapide. Si la playlist est privée ou collaborative, connectez Spotify d'abord, puis effectuez la revue avec l'accès de votre compte.
This playlist is not publicly readable. Use a public Spotify playlist link.
Workspace Preview
Paste a playlist link to populate the overview, review summary, evidence panels, and the embedded paid modules below.
Résumé de la playlist
The dashboard will fill with playlist metadata, review evidence, and action guidance once you run a scan.
Overview
1 link
Paste one Spotify playlist URL to populate the report.
Review Summary
3 states
Low, Moderate, or Elevated review outcomes.
Evidence
Explainable
Flags and notes stay tied to visible playlist signals.
Prochaine étape recommandée
Revue générale
Waiting for scan
Confiance
Pending
Run a scan to unlock the next-step guidance
The tool will convert current playlist signals into a due-diligence recommendation your team can shortlist, pause, or escalate.
History
Paid
Saved scans and trend context live inside the dashboard.
Pitch Copy
Contextual
Pitch generation uses the current review as context.
Signals this workspace checks
History & trend panel
Paid keeps scan history in the workspace so teams can review changes over time and keep a documented trail.
Overview
1 link
Review Summary
3 states
Evidence
Explainable
History
Paid
Unlock history and saved review context
Paid adds saved scan history, repeat-scan context, and client-ready report framing inside the dashboard.
Unlock PaidThis tool is built for the moment when a team needs to decide whether a playlist is worth pitching, worth paying for, or worth escalating for manual review. It does not claim to confirm fraud. It organizes current playlist evidence into a documented due-diligence workflow.
Use the dashboard before you buy placement, pitch a curator, or include a playlist in a client-facing recommendation. The goal is to reduce avoidable campaign risk and force a review step before money or reputation is on the line.
The review focuses on visible playlist evidence such as metadata quality, duplicate density, artist concentration, availability issues, and high-risk wording in titles or descriptions. That keeps the output explainable for internal QA and client conversations.
The free layer gives a verdict, confidence level, and top review flags. Paid unlocks the deeper working material: saved history, fuller notes, client-ready reporting, and pitch generation that uses the current review as context.
This dashboard works best when you treat it as a pre-approval step before playlist outreach, paid placement, or client reporting.
Start with the exact playlist you are considering for a pitch, placement buy, or recommendation. Public playlists work immediately from the link.
Check whether the playlist lands in Low, Moderate, or Elevated review. That first verdict tells your team how much manual review is still needed.
Use the flags, policy wording checks, and manual notes to understand why the verdict was produced. The tool is meant to support due diligence, not replace judgment.
Use the review to move forward with the playlist, pause it for extra checking, or document why it should be removed from your shortlist.
The tool focuses on current playlist evidence that can be explained to a team, artist, or client instead of making black-box fraud claims.
Titles, descriptions, owner presentation, and other visible metadata are reviewed for low-quality or suspicious patterns.
The dashboard looks for unusual artist concentration, roster mismatch, and composition patterns that deserve extra human review.
Duplicate tracks, unavailable songs, repeated release patterns, and other maintenance issues are surfaced as explainable review flags.
Playlist title and description wording is checked against publicly risky promotional language such as guaranteed placement or guaranteed streams.
The strongest use case is the point where someone must approve a playlist target, document a recommendation, or stop a questionable placement before it becomes a problem.
Run candidate playlists through the dashboard before outreach starts so weak targets are filtered out before an artist or client sees them.
Use the review output as a written record of why a playlist was approved, paused, or escalated for more checking.
Agencies and consultants can use the structured notes to explain why a playlist belongs on a shortlist or why it should be excluded.
These are representative workflow moments, not promises about what every scan will find. They show how a team can use the tool before making a placement decision.
An artist pastes a playlist they were asked to pay for and sees multiple review flags tied to wording, duplication, and concentration signals.
Outcome: the playlist is paused for manual review before any money is spent.
A pitching team uses the dashboard to clean a shortlist and remove playlists that would be hard to defend in a client update.
Outcome: only the playlists with cleaner review profiles move into outreach.
A label scans candidate playlists so internal stakeholders can see the verdict, evidence, and saved history before approving budget.
Outcome: the campaign decision is easier to justify and easier to revisit later.
Non. Il met en évidence les signaux de revue et les indicateurs de diligence raisonnable qui soutiennent une revue manuelle.
Spotify ne fournit pas d'API de suivi des abonnés historiques. Les analyses enregistrées peuvent créer un historique au fil du temps.
Les clients Agency peuvent exporter des rapports PDF prêts pour le client.
Non. Les agences bénéficient le plus des fonctionnalités de flux de travail, mais les labels et les artistes peuvent également utiliser le processus de revue.
Cela signifie que plusieurs indicateurs de revue ont été déclenchés et que la playlist mérite une revue manuelle plus approfondie avant le placement.
Non. Il s'agit d'un outil de diligence raisonnable et d'assurance qualité de campagne, pas d'un moteur de verdict de fraude définitif.
Il est plus utile pour les agences, les labels indépendants et les artistes sérieux qui examinent les playlists avant de payer pour un placement.
Les utilisateurs gratuits peuvent effectuer jusqu'à 3 analyses par mois et voir la revue générale, la confiance et les 3 principaux indicateurs.
Les plans payants débloquent les détails complets de la revue, l'historique des analyses enregistrées et les chemins d'exportation de qualité agence en fonction du plan.
Le risque vous indique combien de revue manuelle une playlist mérite. La confiance vous indique à quel point les preuves actuelles sont complètes.
Oui. La revue est conçue pour soutenir l'assurance qualité de campagne, les discussions d'approbation de playlist et la revue manuelle documentée avant l'approbation des dépenses.
Agency ajoute des fonctionnalités de flux de travail destinées aux clients telles que l'exportation en marque blanche, les notes client et l'organisation de dossiers de campagne pour les équipes qui gèrent les placements pour le compte d'autrui.